What is the optimal case volume for clinical peer review?
We have been advised to more thoroughly screen cases for peer review to focus on a smaller number of cases suggestive of substandard care. Is this a good idea?
Will centralization of peer review activity improve program effectiveness?
How should non-physician members of the medical staff be involved in peer review?
What is the proper role of the Morbidity & Mortality Conference in peer review?
How is this process important to Quality Improvement?